Aguirre v. City of New York et al
| Jairo Aguirre |
| City of New York and John Doe and Jane Doe 1-10 |
| 1:2015cv06043 |
| October 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Pamela K. Chen |
| James Orenstein |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: For the reasons in the attached Memorandum and order, the Court grants Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiff's municipal liabil ity claim against the City and Defendants' partial motion for summary judgment only as to Plaintiff's failure to intervene claim against Alexander relating to the alleged violation of Plaintiffs right to a fair trial. However, Defendants� 39; partial summary judgment motion is denied as to Plaintiff's (1) malicious prosecution claim against Alexander, (2) violation of the right to a fair trial against both Cromwell and Alexander, and (3) failure to intervene claim against Cromwel l and Alexander with respect to the alleged false arrest, unlawful search, and malicious prosecution of Plaintiff, and against Cromwell with respect to Alexander's alleged violation of Plaintiff's right to a fair trial. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/22/2017. (Lee, Helen)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
