Greene et al v. The City of New York et al
| Anthony Greene, Blacksun Greene, Kwane Greene, Messiah Greene, Monifa Greene and Yasin Greene |
| NYC Police Officer John Doe 1, NYC Police Officer John Doe 2, NYC Police Officer John Doe 3, NYC Police Officer John Doe 4, NYC Police Officer John Doe 5, NYC Police Officer John Doe 6, New York City Police Department and The City of New York |
| 1:2015cv06436 |
| November 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| Cheryl L. Pollak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM & ORDER, For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' (Dkt. 46) motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The following claims survive summary judgment: the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims for the (1) unlawful search o f 377 MacDonough Street, (2) the false arrest of Blacksun Greene, and (3) the excessive force used against Anthony Greene; and the state-law claims for the (4) assault and battery of Blacksun and (5) assault and battery of Anthony. The state claims s urvive against both the Officer Defendants and the City under respondeat superior. The court DIRECTS the parties to contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak to schedule a conference regarding the next steps in this case. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 8/5/2019. (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
