Gindi v. Bennett et al
| Lisa Gindi |
| Mr. Thomas Bennett, Dr. Ann Garner and Hubert Guscott |
| 1:2015cv06475 |
| November 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Marilyn D. Go |
| Roslynn R. Mauskopf |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
JUDGMENT in favor of New York City Department of Education against Lisa Gindi.Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/26/2018. (Zhu, Angela)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 13 Motion for Reconsideration: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, Gindi's motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 13) is denied. Gindi's request for a conference and her request for p ermission to file a motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to renew the applications at a later stage of the action. This action is recommitted to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all pre-trial proceedings, including addressing any issues with service of the remaining defendants, as well as plaintiffs request for default judgment (Doc. No. 21). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to plaintiff Lisa Gindi, pro se, and note the mailing on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 1/4/2017. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Gindi's claims, including the newly added claims relating to the state court action, against all defendants with the exception of the New York City Department of Education are dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). No summons shall issue as to these defendants, and it is further; ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all parties, with the exception of the New York City Department of Education, from this action , and it is further; ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is hereby directed to serve the summons, complaint, first amended complaint, second amended complaint, the Court's Orders dated February 1, 2016, and April 13, 2016, and the instant Order upon defendant the New York City Department ofEducation. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appea l. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk or Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the plaintiff pro se and note the mailing on the docket.Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 6/17/2016. (Taronji, Robert)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Gindi is granted one last opportunity to submit a second amended complaint. If Gindi fails to submit a second amended complaint within thirty (30) days or fails to properly plead her claims as directed by this Order, the Court s hall enter judgment dismissing the action. No summons shall issue at this time and all further proceedings shall be stayed for thirty (30) days. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk or Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to theplaintiff pro se and note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 4/13/2016. (Taronji, Robert)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff Lisa Gindi, proceeding pro se, filed the instant complaint alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. ("Title VII"), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. ("the ADEA''), and the Americanswith Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. ("ADA"). Along with her complaint, plaintiff files a request to proceed informa pauperis pursuant to 28 U .S.C. § 1915. Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED solely for the purpose of the instant order. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, or the instant action shall be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). So Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 1/29/2016. (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
