Order requiring Apple, Inc. to assist in the execution of a search warrant issued by the court et al
American Civil Liberties Union |
Apple Inc. |
Order requiring Apple, Inc. to assist in the execution of a search warrant issued by the court |
United States of America |
1:2015mc01902 |
October 8, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
James Orenstein |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER denying 1 Motion to Compel. For the reasons set forth in the attached document, the motion is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 2/29/2016. (Orenstein, James) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: On October 8, 2015, the government submitted under seal an application for an order pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, directing Apple, Inc. to assist in the execution of a federal search warrant by disabling the security of an Apple device that the government has lawfully seized pursuant to a warrant issued by this court. I respectfully direct the Clerk to maintain that document under seal on the public docket of this matter. I further respectfully direc t the Clerk to file on the public docket of the same matter my Memorandum and Order dated October 8, 2015, which ruled on the government's application without referring to any specific information that would compromise a continuing investigation.. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 10/9/2015. (Gillespie, Saudia) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.