Martinez v. City of New York et al
Rosie Martinez |
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 |
1:2016cv00079 |
January 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Ann M Donnelly |
Cheryl L. Pollak |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 261 MEMORANDUM & ORDER. For the reasons outlined herein, Defendants' pending Rule 50 motions, as well as their Rule 59 remittitur motion 242 , are each denied. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 7/19/2023. (BC) |
Filing 198 ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum and order, defendants' motion for summary judgment and to dismiss 183 is granted in part and denied in part. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 9/30/2021. (Daus, Benjamin) |
Filing 168 ORDER re 137 : For the reasons stated in the attached Order, the Court Orders that plaintiff be awarded $134,610.00 in fees and $7,457.32 in costs to be paid by the City of New York and not the individual defendants. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 3/18/2019. (Graham, Emily) |
Filing 113 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. I adopt Judge Pollak's R&R in part. The City is to pay all reasonable expenses incurred as a result of the defendant's discovery failures; these expenses include fees associated with additional depositions o f witnesses who have already been deposed, depositions of newly identified witnesses, and attorneys' fees in connection with depositions and the sanctions motion. I will consider additional appropriate sanctions and curative measures at trial. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 4/18/2018. (Greene, Donna) |
Filing 101 ORDER denying 90 . The Court concludes that good cause to file under seal is lacking, and therefore denies the motion. Plaintiff's counsel is Ordered to file the Reply on the public docket. See Order for details. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 1/26/2018. (Blase, Brendan) |
Filing 83 ORDER re 82 . As explained in the attached Order, the defendants shall produce the outstanding discovery materials by 12/18/2017. The defendants may submit appropriate affidavits to meet their burden of demonstrating undue burden or expense by 12/15/2017 and the Court will consider whether defendants have met their burden. The defendants are free to apply to the district court for leave to file a motion for summary judgment, but any such application must explicitly notify th e district judge that defendants' request is untimely under the terms of this Court's prior Order and they shall set forth "good cause" for their untimely filing so that the district judge may consider their request. The Cour t has scheduled a status conference to facilitate the expeditious resolution of any outstanding discovery disputes not resolved by this Order for 12/20/2017 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 13B South. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 12/14/2017. (Blase, Brendan) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.