Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Doe v. National Conference of Bar Examiners et al

Doe v. National Conference of Bar Examiners et al

Plaintiff:	Pseudonym Jane Doe
Defendant:	Penny Gessler, Erica Moeser and National Conference of Bar Examiners
Case Number:	1:2016cv00264
Filed:	January 19, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Pamela K. Chen
Presiding Judge:	Steven M. Gold
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 25, 2017	Filing 35 ORDER denying 30 Motion for Reconsideration: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum and order, Plaintiff's 30 motion for reconsideration is denied. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 5/25/2017. (Chivers, Jeffrey)
January 6, 2017	Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons in the attached, Plaintiff's request to proceed anonymously is DENIED and Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the caption of this case to replace Jane Doe with Natasha Vernon as the Plaintiff, enter judgment accordingly, and close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 1/6/2017. (Merin, Eric)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 25, 2017

Filing 35 ORDER denying 30 Motion for Reconsideration: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum and order, Plaintiff's 30 motion for reconsideration is denied. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 5/25/2017. (Chivers, Jeffrey)

January 6, 2017

Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons in the attached, Plaintiff's request to proceed anonymously is DENIED and Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the caption of this case to replace Jane Doe with Natasha Vernon as the Plaintiff, enter judgment accordingly, and close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 1/6/2017. (Merin, Eric)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. National Conference of Bar Examiners et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pseudonym Jane Doe
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Penny Gessler
Represented By:	Samantha E Beltre
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Erica Moeser
Represented By:	Samantha E Beltre
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: National Conference of Bar Examiners
Represented By:	Samantha E Beltre
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?