Aponte v. Horn
||February 22, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
||Kiyo A. Matsumoto
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 4, 2016
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the annexed opinion and those set forth in the court's February 28, 2011 memorandum and order in No. 09-cv-4334, petitioner's instant habeas petitions are dismissed. Furthermore, the court notifies petiti oner that if he files any further repetitious filings challenging the same 3/8/06 conviction, the court may direct petitioner to show cause why an order barring him from filing any future in forma pauperis petitions without first obtaining leave of c ourt should not be entered. Since petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability shall not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); see also Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 112-13 (2d Cir. 2000). The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) that any appeal from a judgment denying the instant petition would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in and close these three cases. The Clerk of Court is further directed to send a copy of this memorandum and order to petitioner. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/4/2016. (Jacobson, Jonathan)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?