Luna et al v. Gon Way Construction Inc. et al
| Rafael Castro, Freddy Luna and Fidel Sanchez |
| Gon Way Construction Inc., Sweeney T. Lee and Wendell Lee |
| 1:2016cv01411 |
| March 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Vera M. Scanlon |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment is granted. Freddy Luna is awarded $97,789.00, plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $13,059.74, plus an additional $10.82 per day from Febru ary 14, 2017, until judgment is entered. Rafael Castro is awarded $54,525.00, plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $6,626.43, plus an additional $5.49 per day from February 14, 2017, until judgment is entered. Fidel Sanchez is aw arded $86,160.00, plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $11,333.73, plus an additional $9.39 per day from February 14, 2017, until judgment is entered. Plaintiffs motion for attorneys fees and costs is denied without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment for the plaintiffs consistent with this order. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 3/2/2017. (Matsumura, Rebecca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
