AlmondNet, Inc. et al v. Yahoo! Inc.
| AlmondNet, Inc., Datonics, LLC and Intent IQ, LLC |
| Yahoo! Inc. |
| 1:2016cv01557 |
| March 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| I. Leo Glasser |
| Steven M. Gold |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
MEMORANDUM & ORDER, For the foregoing reasons, I direct that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, confident in the belief that the interest of justice requires it. The Clerk of the Court is dir ected to take the necessary actions to accomplish the transfer. Case transferred to District of Delaware. So Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 12/5/2018.Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER denying the defendants motion 97 to reconsider, denying the plaintiffs motion 101 to transfer to the Southern District of New York, and denying plaintiffs conditional motion 113 to consolidate and transfer to Delaware. The parties are directed to appear at 11:00 a.m. on August 30, 2018 for a status conference. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 8/21/2018. (Kessler, Stanley)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
