Todd v. New York City Health and Hospital Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Maxine A. Todd
Defendant: New York City Health and Hospital Corporation and Park City 3 & 4 Apartments, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2016cv02124
Filed: April 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge: LaShann DeArcy Hall
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 276 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum and order, the Hospital Defendants' motion 253 for summary judgment is GRANTED and the § 1983 claims against them are dismissed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this memorandum and order to the pro se litigant. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 9/29/2021. (Williams, Erica)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 267 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum and order, Park City Defendants' 228 229 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and the § 1981 claim against them is dismissed. City Defendants' motion 233 243 for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and the § 1983 claim for warrantless entry is dismissed. The § 1983 claim for unreasonable seizure remains. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this memorandum and order to the pro se litigant. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 3/31/2021. (Williams, Erica)
October 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: For the reasons stated in this Court's October 12, 2016 Memorandum of Decision and Order, Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1985 claims against New York City Health and Hospital Corporation, Park City 3 & 4 Apartments, I nc., Louis Kramberg, and Chandra Jain are hereby dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b)(ii) for failure to state a claim. Likewise, Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1981 claims against New York City Health and Hospital Corporation are hereby dismissed. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 10/12/2016. (Castro, Monica)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Todd v. New York City Health and Hospital Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Health and Hospital Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Park City 3 & 4 Apartments, Inc.
Represented By: Jack L. Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maxine A. Todd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?