LG Capital Funding, LLC v. VAPE Holdings, Inc.
||LG Capital Funding, LLC
||VAPE Holdings, Inc.
||May 3, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
||Carol Bagley Amon
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 18, 2016
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Minute entry dated 8/17/16: No party has objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has passed. When deciding whether to adopt an R&R, a district court "may accept, reject, or modif y, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(6)(1). To accept those portions of the R&R to which no timely objection has been made, "a district court need only satisfy itself th at there is no clear error on the face of the record." Jarvis v. N. Am. Globes Fund L.P., 823 F. Supp. 2d 161, 163 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) (internal quotation marks omitted). The Court has reviewed the R&R and the record and, finding no clear error, adopts Magistrate Judge Bloom's recommendations. Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 11/17/2016. (Fernandez, Erica)
|June 2, 2016
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: On May 5, 2016, the Court ordered VHI to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be issued. (D.E. # 6 .) On May 27, 2016, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons that follow, LG's motion is denied. Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 6/1/2016. (Fernandez, Erica)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?