Wtulich v. Filipkowska
| Nikodem Wtulich |
| Magda Filipkowska |
| 1:2016cv02941 |
| June 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Edward R. Korman |
| James Orenstein |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 11601 - INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION REMEDIES |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 73 Motion for Attorney Fees. For the reasons set forth in the attached document, I grant the motion in part and order respondent Filipkowska to reimburse petitioner Wtulich $19,699.47, consisting of $14,887.50 in reasonable attorneys' fees and $4,811.97 in compensable costs. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 3/24/2020. (Orenstein, James)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER denying 76 Motion for New Trial; denying 85 Motion to Stay. For the reasons set forth in the attached document, I deny the respondent's motions for a new trial and for a stay of the judgment pending appeal. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 7/3/2019. (Orenstein, James)
|
|
Filing
62
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: For the reasons set forth in the attached document, I find that the petitioner has established that the respondent wrongfully retained their daughter in violation of the Hague Convention and that the responden t has failed to establish any applicable exception. I therefore grant the petition and order the respondent to return the parties' daughter to her habitual residence of Poland promptly. I respectfully direct the Clerk to enter judgment according ly, but to defer closing the case to accommodate the following supplemental proceedings. Specifically, I respectfully direct the parties to confer and to submit a jointly proposed transition plan by March 27, 2019, that provides for the petitioner to have access to the parties' daughter until her return to Poland, as well as for the parties to secure a passport for their daughter. The petitioner may file a request for the payment of his necessary expenses incurred in connection with this pr oceeding by April 30, 2019. Any such request for legal fees must include counsel's contemporaneous billing statements; any request for other costs must include a detailed explanation of how each expense for which payment is sought was necessarily incurred to prosecute this action. The respondent may file any objections to the bill of costs by May 14, 2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 3/20/2019. (Orenstein, James)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wtulich v. Filipkowska | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Magda Filipkowska | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nikodem Wtulich | |
| Represented By: | S. Michael Musa-Obregon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
