Taffe v. New York City School Construction Authority
| Kenneth E. Taffe |
| City of New York, Marianne Egri and New York City School Construction Authority |
| 1:2016cv02975 |
| June 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Brian M. Cogan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
DECISION AND ORDER granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment, dismissing the complaint. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/1/2017. Fwd'd for judgment. C/M. (Clarke, Melonie)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 6/14/16 that the complaint is dismissed as to defendants Marianne Egri and the City of New York. Plaintiffs 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied. The Court directs plaintiff to pay the fili ng fee of $400.00 within 14 days of the date of this Order in order to proceed with this action. If the filing fee is paid, the Clerk of Court shall prepare a summons solely as to plaintiffs employer, the New York City School Construction Author ity, and plaintiff shall effect service pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.If plaintiff fails to comply with this Order within the time allowed, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 6/14/2016 ) c/m (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
