Pearson v. Reid-Robinson et al
| Marcia Pearson |
| Elizabeth Downer and Sarah Reid-Robinson |
| 1:2016cv03139 |
| June 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Roslynn R. Mauskopf |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court finds that Pearson has failed to raise a plausible claim for fraud or tortious interference with a fiduciary duty for the reasons set forth by Judge Kuo. As such, Pearson's objection is overrul ed, the R&R (Doc. No. 39 ) is adopted in its entirety, and the amended complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Pearson at the address listed on the docket and note the mailing on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to enter judgment pursuant to this Order and close the case. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 4/1/2019. (Taronji, Robert)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER: Pursuant to the annexed order, the Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to issue a summons against the defendant. Plaintiff is granted until February 28, 2017 to serve the Summons and Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 11/30/2016. (Copy mailed to pro se Plaintiff.) (Feldman, Shira)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
