Chartwell Therapeutics Licensing, LLC v. Citron Pharma LLC
| Chartwell Therapeutics Licensing, LLC |
| Citron Pharma LLC |
| 1:2016cv03181 |
| June 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Margo K. Brodie |
| Cheryl L. Pollak |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
233
Order: Citron's motion to strike or dismiss the Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The claims against Rising Pharma are SEVERED and TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey with a rec ommendation that the case be referred to Judge Vincent F. Papalia of the United States Bankruptcy Court of New Jersey. And defendants' motions to strike or disregard plaintiff's declaration are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 11/30/2020. (Liss, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER granting: 106 Motion to Seal; 108 Motion to Seal and; granting 114 Motion to Compel. Granting in part and denying in part 118 Motion for Discovery and; 119 Motion for Protective Order. For the reasons set forth in the attached O rder: 1) the Clerk of Court is to file the document listed in 106 and 108 under seal; 2) Chartwell is Ordered to produce the QuickBooks work file as an electronic file on a flash drive and to produce an affidavit from the records custodian by 10/28/18; 3) the parties are Ordered to meet and confer and submit to the Court a proposed deposition schedule by 10/26/18. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 10/23/2018. (Graham, Emily)
|
|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 71 ; granting 85 ; denying 92 . For the reasons set forth in this Opinion, Chartwell's 71 motion for protective order is granted, Citron's 85 motion to amend its responses to the requests for admission is granted, and Citron's 92 motion to compel is denied. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 7/17/2018. (Blase, Brendan)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER ADOPTING 80 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court has reviewed the unopposed R&R and, finding no clear error, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Court denies Plaintiffs motion for an order of pre-judgment attachment. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/20/2018. (McKenzie, Lindsay)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chartwell Therapeutics Licensing, LLC v. Citron Pharma LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chartwell Therapeutics Licensing, LLC | |
| Represented By: | John P. Amato |
| Represented By: | Stephen Joseph Grable |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Citron Pharma LLC | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Papalia |
| Represented By: | Lisa Anne Rega Bicocchi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
