Collins v. Colgate Palmolive et al
Plaintiff: Charline Collins
Defendant: Colgate Palmolive and Frank Niglia
Case Number: 1:2016cv03366
Filed: June 17, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge: Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Collins' amended complaint is dismissed for failure tostate a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Because allegations in the amended complaint and the attachments thereto make it clear that further amendme nt would be futile, Collins is not granted leave to amend her pleading for a second time. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperi s status is denied for purposes of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment against Collins and in favor of defendant Colgate Palmolive, to mail a copy of that judgment and this memorandum and order to Collins, to note that mailing on the docket sheet, and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 11/18/2019. (Taronji, Robert)
March 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Collins's request to proceed in forma pauperis (" IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is granted. For the reasons stated below, Collins's claims against defendant Frank Niglia are dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). With respect to defendant Colgate Palmolive ("Colgate"), Collins is granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. No summons shall issue at this time and all further proceedings shall be stayed for thirty (30) days oruntil further order of the Court. Failure to timely comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 1915 (a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk o f Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order and a form complaint for employment discrimination to plaintiff Charline Collins, prose, and note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/8/2017. (Taronji, Robert)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. Colgate Palmolive et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colgate Palmolive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Niglia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charline Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?