Bussie v. Lew et al
| Anthony Bussie |
| Joseph Biden, Jacob Lew, Loretta Lynch, Military Court, Paul Ryan and Special Inspector General for Trouble Asset Relief Program |
| 1:2016cv03780 |
| June 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Margo K. Brodie |
| Vera M. Scanlon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM & ORDER [DISMISSING CASE AS FRIVOLOUS]: Plaintiff's 4 requests to proceed in forma pauperis, filed 4/8/2016, 6/17/2016 and 7/25/2016 are granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 solely for the purpose of this Mem orandum and Order. Accordingly, the Court dismisses these complaints as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Plaintiff is hereby notified that if he makes any further frivolous filings, the Court may direct Plaintiff to s how cause why an order barring him from filing any future in forma pauperis actions without first obtaining leave of Court should not be entered. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 8/24/2016. C/mailed. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
