Latimore v. City of New York et al
| Latimore and Charles Latimore |
| City of New York, Detective Dudley Ewald, Detective Noel Lawrence and John and Jane 1 through 10 Doe |
| 1:2016cv05275 |
| September 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Steven M Gold |
| Roslynn R Mauskopf |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The stipulation at #15 is so ordered. The action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 7/11/2017. (Taronji, Robert)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION of Dismissal by City of New York, Dudley Ewald, Noel Lawrence (Telfort, Pernell) |
|
STATUS REPORT ORDER: Counsel shall file a stipulation of dismissal or joint status report letter by July 3, 2017. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 6/2/2017. (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement by City of New York, Dudley Ewald, Noel Lawrence (Telfort, Pernell) |
|
STATUS REPORT ORDER: Counsel shall file a joint status report letter by May 26, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the imposition of sanctions. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 5/16/2017. (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
| Filing 13 Minute Entry: Initial Conference Hearing held on 3/23/2017 before Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Zaltzberg for plaintiff, Telfort for defendants. The parties will complete Rule 26(a)(1) disclsoures by March 24. Counsel will submit a letter by April 28 either reporting that the case has been settled, seeking a settlement conference, or proposing a case management schedule. (Gillespie, Saudia) |
| Filing 12 Minute Entry: Initial Conference Hearing held on 3/15/2017 before Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Telfort for defendants. Counsel for plaintiff failed to appear and could not be reached by telephone. THE CONFERENCE SET FOR TODAY IS ADJOURNED TO MARCH 23, 2017 AT 2:30 PM. A SECOND FAILURE TO APPEAR WILL RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS. (Gillespie, Saudia) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of New York, Dudley Ewald, Noel Lawrence. (Telfort, Pernell) |
| Filing 10 Amended Summons Issued as to Dudley Ewald, Noel Lawrence. (Manson, Eddie) |
| Filing 9 Proposed Summons. by Charles Latimore (Zaltzberg, Raoul) |
|
ORDER: #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer is hereby granted. The time for defendant City of New York to to file an answer, move, or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint is extended to March 6, 2017. Accordingly, the Initial Conference presently scheduled for January 24, 2017, is adjourned to March 15, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 13D South before Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 1/5/2017. (Kaufman, Zachary)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by City of New York. (Telfort, Pernell) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to City of New York, Dudley Ewald, Noel Lawrence. (Manson, Eddie). |
| Filing 6 Corrected Proposed Summonses by Charles Latimore, Proposed Summons. by Charles Latimore (Zaltzberg, Raoul) Modified typographical error on 11/7/2016 (Gillespie, Saudia). |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Charles Latimore (Zaltzberg, Raoul) |
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held at 10:00 a.m. on January 24, 2017 before the undersigned in Courtroom 13-D South. Counsel for all parties must attend. Counsel for plaintiff is directed to immediately confirm this conference date and time with defendant's counsel. Adjournment requests will not be considered unless made in accordance with this Court's Individual Rules. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 9/27/2016. (Attachments: #1 Chambers Individual Rules) (Gillespie, Saudia)
|
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-8932954 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Charles Latimore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Zaltzberg, Raoul) |
| Case assigned to Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf and Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| NOTICE - Summons form can be found under the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
