Lopez v. Cuomo et al
Ramon Lopez |
Anthony J. Annucci, Andrew Cuomo and John Doe |
1:2016cv05323 |
September 21, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Lois Bloom |
Roslynn R. Mauskopf |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Lopez's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. For the reasons discussed, Lopez's claims against Governor Andrew Cuomo and Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision are dismissed. No summonses shall issue as to these defendants and the Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption to reflect the dismissal of these defendants. Lopez is granted thirty (30) days leave to f ile an amended complaint as to the Parole Bureau Chief at the DOCCS. If Lopez fails to amend the complaint, it shall be dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to Lopez and note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 6/20/2017. (Taronji, Robert) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.