FUJIFILM North America Corporation v. Abesons Corp et al
| FUJIFILM North America Corporation |
| Abesons Corp, Avis Sales Corp., Big Value Inc., EPICESOLUTIONS, F&E Trading LLC, Gadget Circuit LLC, Geleshmall Enterprises LLC, Get It Digital LLC, Goldex Limited, LE Reliable Trading, Max Trading, OJ Basics, Soch Global Inc. and Tri-State Camera Exch. Inc. |
| 1:2016cv05677 |
| October 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Brian M. Cogan |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
216
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 9/4/18 that plaintiff's 185 , 190 motions in limine and 189 Daubert motion are GRANTED. Plaintiff's 191 motion in limine is GRANTED IN PART AND RESERVED IN PART. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/4/2018 ) (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 3/9/17 that FUJI's 85 Motion is granted in part and denied in part, and Geleshmall's 95 Motion is denied. Geleshmalls counterclaims are stayed for 30 days so that Geleshmall can commence an arbitration, upon which the stay will continue. If Geleshmall does not commence an arbitration on its counterclaims within that time, the counterclaims will be dismissed. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/9/2017 ) (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
