Jung et al v. Kelly et al
| Hannah Jung and Mideum Jung |
| Diane D Kelly, Merck & Co., Inc. and Wheels LT |
| 1:2016cv06097 |
| November 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Decision and Order, the Court grants in part and denies in part 43 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court finds that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment as to the permanent los s of use and 90/180-day categories of serious injury. Summary judgment is denied for the significant limitation and permanent consequential limitation categories, and is denied with respect to causation. The case will proceed to trial as to the rem aining claims. The parties are directed to file a Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by January 30, 2021. The parties are directed to Judge Kuo's individual rules for further guidance on the Proposed Pretrial Order. If the parties would like to schedule a settlement conference, they should jointly propose, by December 16, 2020, mutually agreeable dates for the Court's consideration. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 11/30/2020. (Jochnowitz, David)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
