Mehmeti v. Jofaz Transportation, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Mehmeti v. Jofaz Transportation, Inc.

Mehmeti v. Jofaz Transportation, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Subi Mehmeti
Defendant:	Jofaz Transportation, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2016cv07085
Filed:	December 20, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	William F. Kuntz
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 7, 2017	Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's case is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefo re in forma pauperis status is DENIED for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 269 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). * Forwarded for judgment. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 3/6/2017. (Tavarez, Jennifer) Modified on 3/7/2017 (Tavarez, Jennifer).
January 25, 2017	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, the complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). In light of Plaintiffs prose status, the court grants thirty (30) days leave to amend the compl aint in order to state a claim under Title I of the ADA. Plaintiff is reminded that an amended complaint completely replaces the original complaint. The amended complaint must be captioned, "Amended Complaint," and shall bear the same docke t number as this order. No summons shall issue at this time, and all further proceedings shall be stayed for thirty (30) days. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days, judgment shall enter. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauper is status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Re 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 1/25/2017. (Rodriguez, Lori)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 7, 2017

Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's case is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefo re in forma pauperis status is DENIED for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 269 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). * Forwarded for judgment. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 3/6/2017. (Tavarez, Jennifer) Modified on 3/7/2017 (Tavarez, Jennifer).

January 25, 2017

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, the complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). In light of Plaintiffs prose status, the court grants thirty (30) days leave to amend the compl aint in order to state a claim under Title I of the ADA. Plaintiff is reminded that an amended complaint completely replaces the original complaint. The amended complaint must be captioned, "Amended Complaint," and shall bear the same docke t number as this order. No summons shall issue at this time, and all further proceedings shall be stayed for thirty (30) days. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days, judgment shall enter. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauper is status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Re 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 1/25/2017. (Rodriguez, Lori)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mehmeti v. Jofaz Transportation, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Jofaz Transportation, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Subi Mehmeti
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?