Sutphin African Market & Variety Store Inc. v. United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Plaintiff: Sutphin African Market & Variety Store Inc
Defendant: United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Case Number: 1:2017cv00223
Filed: January 14, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: LaShann DeArcy Hall
Presiding Judge: Robert M. Levy
Nature of Suit: Agriculture Acts
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sutphin African Market & Variety Store Inc. v. United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sutphin African Market & Variety Store Inc
Represented By: Osita Emmanuel Okocha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Marutollo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?