Reyes v. Sprint Holding LLC et al
| Nicasio V. Reyes |
| Alester A. Garvey, Eli Maor, Oval Holding LLC, Diane Petersen, Gerald Reyes, Sprint Holding LLC, State Department Division of licensing Office of Corporation Counsel and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2017cv00624 |
| February 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Margo K. Brodie |
| Peggy Kuo |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting defendants' motions to dismiss 25 26 27 28 29 . For the reasons discussed in the attached memorandum and order, the Court dismisses without prejudice plaintiff's Amended Complaint in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 7/9/2018. (Chu, Chan Hee)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: The Court dismisses the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint with 30 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 4/10/2017. (See document for details.) Copy of this Order and the attached copies of all unpublished decisions cited herein sent to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
