Keita v. Bank of America

Keita v. Bank of America

Plaintiff:	Mohammed Keita
Defendant:	Bank of America
Case Number:	1:2017cv00875
Filed:	February 13, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Steven Tiscione
Presiding Judge:	Eric N. Vitaliano
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 21, 2018	Filing 18 MEMORANDUM & ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In line with the reasons contained in the attached Memorandum & Order, the complaint is dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may b e granted. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444 -45 (1962).The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to plaintiff, to enter judgment accordingly, and to close this case. Accordingly, the following motions are terminated as moot: 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Bank of America, 17 Fully Briefed Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Bank of America. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 8/5/2018. (Mejia, Benjamin)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 21, 2018

Filing 18 MEMORANDUM & ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In line with the reasons contained in the attached Memorandum & Order, the complaint is dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may b e granted. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444 -45 (1962).The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to plaintiff, to enter judgment accordingly, and to close this case. Accordingly, the following motions are terminated as moot: 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Bank of America, 17 Fully Briefed Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Bank of America. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 8/5/2018. (Mejia, Benjamin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keita v. Bank of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America
Represented By:	Heather E. Saydah
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mohammed Keita
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?