Keita v. American Security Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Mohammed Keita
Defendant: American Security Insurance Company and Weisbrod Matteis & Copley PLLC
Case Number: 1:2017cv00879
Filed: February 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Steven Tiscione
Presiding Judge: Eric N. Vitaliano
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MEMORANDUM & ORDER, For the foregoing reasons, ASIC's unopposed motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice. So Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 12/9/2021. (fwd'd for jgm) (c/m to Mohammed Keita 863 Father Capodanno Blvd., Staten Island, NY 10305) (Lee, Tiffeny)
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM & ORDER DISMISSING CASE: For the reasons stated in the attached M & O, all claims are dismissed, without prejudice for want of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Although leave to amend his federa l complaint is denied, plaintiff does, of course, have leave to file state claims in a state court of appropriate jurisdiction, if as forewarned of their dubious substantive merit, he believes he can do so in good faith.The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 920-21, 8 L. Ed. 2 d 21 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this memorandum and order to plaintiff, to enter judgment accordingly, and to close this case for administrative purposes. Accordingly, the follow motions are terminated as moot: 28 Letter MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint for failure to prosecute filed by American Security Insurance Company, 11 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference re Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File, filed by Weisbrod Matteis & Copley PLLC, 22 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference re 20 Amended Complaint, filed by Weisbrod Matteis & Copley PLLC. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 8/5/2018. (Mejia, Benjamin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keita v. American Security Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Security Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weisbrod Matteis & Copley PLLC
Represented By: Jonathan B. Bruno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mohammed Keita
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?