Glover v. Kirk

Glover v. Kirk

Petitioner:	Naquan Glover
Respondent:	Superintendent Patrick Kirk
Case Number:	1:2017cv01165
Filed:	February 27, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	William F. Kuntz
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 16, 2021	Filing 12 ORDER: Naquan Glover ("Petitioner"), proceeding pro se, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ("the Petition"), challenging his conviction for Manslaughter in the First-Deg ree and two counts of Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second Degree. Petitioner raised three grounds for relief: (1) that the State Courts erroneously upheld the prosecutors reverse-Batson challenge to a preemptory strike against a jur or; (2) ineffective assistance of trial counsel; and (3) Petitioner's 22-year sentence was excessive. By Decision and Order dated April 20, 2020, the Petition was denied on the merits. By letter dated May 12, 2020, Petitioner requests that the Court review its decision denying the habeas petition. ECF No. 11 . The Court liberally construes Petitioner's request as a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Petitioner's motion for relief pursuant to Rule 60(b) a ccordingly is DENIED as lacking in merit. A certificate of appealability will not issue as the motion fails to raise any substantial issues. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in go od faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 6/16/2021. (Love, Alexis)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 16, 2021

Filing 12 ORDER: Naquan Glover ("Petitioner"), proceeding pro se, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ("the Petition"), challenging his conviction for Manslaughter in the First-Deg ree and two counts of Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second Degree. Petitioner raised three grounds for relief: (1) that the State Courts erroneously upheld the prosecutors reverse-Batson challenge to a preemptory strike against a jur or; (2) ineffective assistance of trial counsel; and (3) Petitioner's 22-year sentence was excessive. By Decision and Order dated April 20, 2020, the Petition was denied on the merits. By letter dated May 12, 2020, Petitioner requests that the Court review its decision denying the habeas petition. ECF No. 11 . The Court liberally construes Petitioner's request as a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Petitioner's motion for relief pursuant to Rule 60(b) a ccordingly is DENIED as lacking in merit. A certificate of appealability will not issue as the motion fails to raise any substantial issues. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in go od faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 6/16/2021. (Love, Alexis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glover v. Kirk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Naquan Glover
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent Patrick Kirk
Represented By:	NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC
Represented By:	QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?