Rodriguez v. N.Y.S. Department of Labor

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Rodriguez v. N.Y.S. Department of Labor

Rodriguez v. N.Y.S. Department of Labor

Plaintiff:	Jorge Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:	N.Y.S. Department of Labor
Case Number:	1:2017cv01894
Filed:	November 6, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	Eric N. Vitaliano
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 6, 2017	Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Pro Se Pltff Jorge Rodriguez's motion, filed 10/30/17, which seeks reconsideration of the Court's 10/19/17, order dismissing each of the above-captioned consolidated actions, is denied because he again makes no showing of the Court's misapprehension of facts or law, at the time of its rulings, which would require the Court to revisit its prior decisions. For the same reasons, pltff's "letter of explanation," filed 10/31/17, which the Court cons trues as a second motion for reconsideration of the Court's 10/19/17 order, is denied. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3), that any appeals would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeals. The Clerk of Court is directed to maintain these consolidated cases on the closed docket. (Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 11/3/2017) c/m Associated Cases: 1:17-cv-01894-ENV-LB et al. (Galeano, Sonia)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 6, 2017

Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Pro Se Pltff Jorge Rodriguez's motion, filed 10/30/17, which seeks reconsideration of the Court's 10/19/17, order dismissing each of the above-captioned consolidated actions, is denied because he again makes no showing of the Court's misapprehension of facts or law, at the time of its rulings, which would require the Court to revisit its prior decisions. For the same reasons, pltff's "letter of explanation," filed 10/31/17, which the Court cons trues as a second motion for reconsideration of the Court's 10/19/17 order, is denied. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3), that any appeals would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeals. The Clerk of Court is directed to maintain these consolidated cases on the closed docket. (Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 11/3/2017) c/m Associated Cases: 1:17-cv-01894-ENV-LB et al. (Galeano, Sonia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. N.Y.S. Department of Labor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: N.Y.S. Department of Labor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jorge Rodriguez, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?