Trusteesof the Local 522 Pension Fund et al v. The Consolidated Companies
Trustees of the Local 522 Welfare Fund of New York and New Jersey and Trusteesof the Local 522 Pension Fund |
The Consolidated Companies |
1:2017cv01991 |
April 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
Cheryl L. Pollak |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The court adopts Magistrate Judge Pollak's thorough and well-reasoned report and recommendation. Plaintiffs are awarded damages in the amount of $51,410.71, plus any amount that may accrue from Ma rch 27, 2018 until entry of judgment. Damages, consisting of liquidated damages and pre-judgment interest, shall continue to accrue in the total amount of $26.901 per day until entry of judgment. Plaintiffs are also awarded attorneys' fee s in the amount of $6,637.50 and costs in the amount of $586.50. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $58,364.71, plus any pre-judgment interest and liquidated damages t hat may accrue from March 27, 2018 until entry of judgment, and to close this case. Plaintiffs shall serve defendant with a copy of the R&R, the attached order and the judgment, and note service on the docket. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/27/2018. (Flores, Diego) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.