Hu et al v. The City of New York et al
888 Consulting Corp., Eric Hu and NY Drilling, Inc. |
Dennis Burkart, Michael Camera, Rafael Collis, Salvatore Concialdi, John/Jane Doe(s) Nos. 1-10, Jose L. Espaillat, M Imran, Cesar Romero, The City of New York and Robert Turner |
1:2017cv02348 |
April 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Lois Bloom |
Allyne R. Ross |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 125 ORDER granting 116 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons given in the attached opinion, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and terminate the case. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 1/20/2022. (Reiser, Samantha) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting 42 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: For the reasons given in the attached opinion, the defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in its entirety. The plaintiffs' equal protection, § 1981, due process, and Monell claims are dismissed with prejudice. The plaintiffs' state-law claims are dismissed without prejudice to their re-filing in state court. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and terminate the case. Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 3/9/2018. (Wasserman, Matthew) (Main Document 49 replaced on 3/9/2018) (Guzzi, Roseann). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.