Richardson v. John Doe et al
| Richard Richardson |
| MTA Jane Doe, MTA John Doe and Mrs. Steward |
| 1:2017cv02479 |
| April 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Pamela K. Chen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: For the reasons stated in the attached, the Amended Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment and close the case accordingly. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 4/10/2018. (Hess, Alexandra)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: The Court grants Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis solely for the purpose of this Order. For the reasons in the attached Memorandum and Order, Plaintiff's Complaint, filed in forma pauperis, is dismissed withou t prejudice for failure to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). However, in light of Plaintiffs pro se status, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days from the entry of this Memorandum and Order. All further proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days. If Plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, it shall be captioned "AMENDED COMPLAINT" and bear the same docket number as this Order, 17-CV-2479 (PKC) (LB). The amended complaint sha ll replace the original complaint. Plaintiff must comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and provide facts to support a claim against each Defendant named in the amended complaint, including the date and location of the events at issue and a description of what each Defendant did or failed to do in violation of Plaintiffs civil rights. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the time allowed, judgment dismissing this action shall be entered. If submitted , the amended complaint will be reviewed for compliance with this Memorandum and Order and for sufficiency under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 6/20/2017. (Lee, Helen)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
