Chowdhury v. Contel

Chowdhury v. Contel

Plaintiff:	Badrul H. Chowdhury
Defendant:	Maria Contel
Case Number:	1:2017cv02614
Filed:	April 26, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Pamela K. Chen
Presiding Judge:	Steven M. Gold
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 14, 2017	Filing 7 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to consolidate the two actions for all purposes. The actions will proceed under docket number 17-cv-2613, and all papers filed in these actions shall henceforth bear only the lead case docke t number. The caption of this consolidated action shall be amended in accordance with this Order, and the action assigned docket number 17-cv-2614 shall be administratively closed. The Court notes that Plaintiff has submitted identical IFP applica tions in both actions. This Order therefore will only refer to the IFP filed in the lead action. (Dkt.# 2 in Case No. 17-cv-2613 and in Case No. 17-cv-2614.) The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Pamela K. Chen, on 9/14/2017. C/mailed. (Civil Case Terminated; Cases associated.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 14, 2017

Filing 7 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to consolidate the two actions for all purposes. The actions will proceed under docket number 17-cv-2613, and all papers filed in these actions shall henceforth bear only the lead case docke t number. The caption of this consolidated action shall be amended in accordance with this Order, and the action assigned docket number 17-cv-2614 shall be administratively closed. The Court notes that Plaintiff has submitted identical IFP applica tions in both actions. This Order therefore will only refer to the IFP filed in the lead action. (Dkt.# 2 in Case No. 17-cv-2613 and in Case No. 17-cv-2614.) The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Pamela K. Chen, on 9/14/2017. C/mailed. (Civil Case Terminated; Cases associated.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chowdhury v. Contel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Badrul H. Chowdhury
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Maria Contel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?