Purcell et al v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms et al
| Roxanne Purcell |
| 1-800 Crime Stoppers, 120 Precinct NYPD, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms and Colleen Kavanagh |
| 1:2017cv02742 |
| May 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Pamela K. Chen |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is granted solely for purposes of this Order. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudic e. Plaintiff has failed to allege that she has standing to bring the claims she asserts, and the claims appear to be untimely. The Court has considered whether to allow Plaintiff to amend her Complaint in order to assert standing and grounds for eq uitable tolling. However, the claims must be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) in any case, so amendment would be futile. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good fait h and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/25/2017. (Fletcher, Camille)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
