Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Mayzenberg et al
| Geico Casualty Company, Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company and Government Employees Insurance Company |
| John Doe Defendants "1" - "10", Igor Mayzenberg, Mingmen Acupuncture, P.C. and Sanli Acupuncture, P.C. |
| 1:2017cv02802 |
| May 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| I. Leo Glasser |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
152
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate all pending motions in this case and to enter final judgment as proposed by the parties. See ECF No. 149-1. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 9/6/2022. (Herrera, Isaiah)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' request 133 to file a Rule 56.1 counterstatement. That counterstatement shall be correspondingly numbered as provided in Local Civil Rule 56.1(b) and add no new paragraphs to its 56.1 Statement previously filed.Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 4/3/2019. (Perlman, Alexa)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER denying 68 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 3/1/2019. (Perlman, Alexa)
|
|
Filing
112
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 11/16/2018. (Perlman, Alexa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
