Bey v. Ponte et al
||Vicky Ware Bey
||Cynthia Brann, City of New York, Jane Doe 1-1000, John Doe 1-1000, New York City Department Of Corrections and Aaron Scarlett
|Personal And Professional Capacity Doing Buisness As New York City Department Of Corrections:
||June 9, 2017
||US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
||Brian M. Cogan
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
|Cause of Action:
||42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 25, 2017
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 9/24/17 that On September 20, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion requesting a settlement conference, to compel discovery, and for summary judgement. Plaintiffs motion is denied as moot as the case has already been c losed and judgment entered. The Court certifies pursuant to 28:19l5(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962).( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/24/2017 ) c/m (Guzzi, Roseann)
|September 13, 2017
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER dated 9/13/17 that Defendants motion to dismiss is granted. The unserved defendants are dismissed and any remaining open motions are denied as moot. The Court certifies pursuant to 28:19l5(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/13/2017 ) c/m (Guzzi, Roseann)
|July 28, 2017
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS dated 7/27/17 that no objections have been received. The Court has reviewed this 13 Report and Recommendation and for the reasons stated, adopts it as the Order of this Court.( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/27/2017 ) c/m to plaintiff Bey. (Guzzi, Roseann)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?