Sulaymu-Bey et al v. City of New York et al
| Aleshia M. Sulaymu-Bey and S. Sharpe Sulaymu-Bey |
| Gladys Carrion, Linda Cato, City of New York, Sasha Dawson, Health and Hospitals Corporation, John and Jane Does Police 1-4, Kings County Hospital and LUciana Michelle |
| Kathy Ann Best |
| 1:2017cv03563 |
| June 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Vera M. Scanlon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. I adopt Judge Bulsara's thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The defendants' motion to enforce the October 11, 2019 settlement is denied. The plaintiffs' motion to rescind the settlement is denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 11/16/2020. (Greene, Donna)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted in part and denied in part in accordance with the reasons set forth in this opinion. The plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 3/29/2019. (Greene, Donna)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: The Court grants the plaintiffs' requests to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court directs the plaintiffs to obtain counsel for their four minor children listed in the caption within 30 days from the date o f this Order. The attorney is to file a notice of appearance on the docket. If the plaintiffs fail to do so, the complaint shall be dismissed, without prejudice, as to the minor children. The adult plaintiffs' complaint shall proceed as to their claims against the defendants. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a summons and the United States Marshal Service is directed to serve the following Defendants without prepayment of fees: the City of New York, the Commissioner of ACS , Gladys Carrion, Sasha Dawson, Kathy Ann Best, and Linda Cato, Nikia Williams, employees of ACS, Sergeant John Pheifer, Badge #732, Dr. Luciana Michele, Kings County Hospital, and the Health and Hospitals Corporation. The plaintiffs also sue thr ee unidentified police officers who were involved in the removal of the children on 4/25/2014. Accordingly, within 45 days from the date of this Order, the Court requests that Corporation Counsel for the City of New York ascertain the full name s of the individuals whom the plaintiffs have identified as police officers John and Jane Doe # 2-4, and provide the addresses where these individuals can be served. The plaintiffs, who have not yet provided the Court with the defendants' ad dresses, are directed to submit a letter to the Clerk of Court with the addresses for the remaining defendants within 14 days from the date of this order in order to effect service of process. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Order to the plaintiffs and to the Corporation Counsel for the City of New York, Special Federal Litigation Division. The case is referred to the Honorable Vera M. Scanlon, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial supervision. The Court certifies purs uant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Ann M Donnelly, on 8/2/2017. C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
