Egegbara v. Ponte et al
| Christopher Egegbara |
| Officer Palmentari, Joseph Ponte and Monica Windley |
| 1:2017cv03634 |
| June 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Pamela K. Chen |
| Ramon E. Reyes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum and order, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Joseph Ponte and Monica Windley are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). No summons shall issue as to Defendants Ponte and Win dley. Plaintiff's claim of excessive force shall proceed against Defendant NYC DOC Officer Palmentari. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to serve a copy of the complaint, the summons, and this Order upon Officer Palmentari, who is al leged to be employed at the GRVC. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to serve a courtesy copy of the complaint, summons, and this Order on the Corporation Counsel for the City of New York. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1 915(a)(3) that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal of this Order. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 12/15/2017. (Chivers, Jeffrey)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
