Shaw v. Advanced Contracting Solutions LLC et al
Mohamed Shaw |
TMG Advisory, Inc., WOD Solutions, LLC, Ashwardial "Vinesh" Sookanan, Eoin Moriarty, LJB Contracting, Inc, Advanced Contracting Solutions LLC and ACS-NY LLC |
1:2017cv04335 |
July 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Frederic Block |
Peggy Kuo |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: IT IS ORDERED that this case as to defendants AdvancedContracting Solutions LLC, Eoin Moriarty and WOD Solutions North is stayed and administratively closed, subject to reopening on the application of any party if the bankruptcy proceeding is terminated without disposing of the claims asserted therein. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 12/28/17. (Innelli, Michael) |
Filing 20 Notice of Filing Bankruptcy (Lalli, Dennis) |
Filing 19 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney for Alexander L. Gastman by Mohamed Shaw. (Dodson, Penn) |
ELECTRONIC ORDER: Granting Alexander Gastman motion #19 to withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Alexander Gastman terminated. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 11/17/2017. (Innelli, Michael) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Mohamed Shaw of Certain Defendants (Dodson, Penn) |
Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Mohamed Shaw. Eoin Moriarty waiver sent on 11/2/2017, answer due 1/1/2018. (Dodson, Penn) |
Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Mohamed Shaw. WOD Solutions, LLC waiver sent on 11/2/2017, answer due 1/1/2018. (Dodson, Penn) |
Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Mohamed Shaw. Advanced Contracting Solutions LLC waiver sent on 11/2/2017, answer due 1/1/2018. (Dodson, Penn) |
ELECTRONIC Order Dismissing: Defendants TMG Advisory, Inc., LJB Contracting, Inc and Ashwardial "Vinesh" Sookanan, only. See entry #18 . Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 11/15/2017. (Innelli, Michael) |
ORDER: Plaintiff's counsel is directed to separately refile, by November 22, 2017 each waiver of service and stipulation of dismissal attached to the response to the Order to Show cause filed at #14 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 11/15/2017. (Riquelme, Claudia) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Mohamed Shaw (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Waiver of Service, #2 Exhibit Waiver of Service, #3 Exhibit Waiver of Service, #4 Exhibit Dismissal) (Dodson, Penn) |
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is ordered to show cause by November 8, 2017 why no affidavit of service has been filed regarding the summons issued on July 24, 2017. Failure to do so may result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 10/25/2017. (Riquelme, Claudia) |
Filing 13 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 12 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 10 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Mohamed Shaw (Gastman, Alexander) |
NOTICE - the Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to forward a completed Civil Cover Sheet, answering all questions in NY-E Division of Business Rule 50.1(d)(2) section on the second page. This document can be found under the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Penn Anderson Dodson on behalf of Mohamed Shaw (aty to be noticed) (Dodson, Penn) |
Filing 8 Proposed Summons. by Mohamed Shaw (Gastman, Alexander) |
Filing 7 Proposed Summons. by Mohamed Shaw (Gastman, Alexander) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons. by Mohamed Shaw (Gastman, Alexander) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Mohamed Shaw (Gastman, Alexander) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Mohamed Shaw (Gastman, Alexander) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Mohamed Shaw (Gastman, Alexander) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Mohamed Shaw (Gastman, Alexander) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against Advanced Contracting Solutions LLC, LJB Contracting, Inc, Eoin Moriarty, Ashwardial "Vinesh" Sookanan, TMG Advisory, Inc., WOD Solutions, LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-9699598 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Mohamed Shaw. (Gastman, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.