Harger Da Silva v. New York City Transit Authority et al
Luisa Janssen Harger Da Silva |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority and Raqia Shabazz, |
1:2017cv04550 |
August 2, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Frederic Block |
Cheryl L. Pollak |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 238 ORDER. For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiff's 222 Motion for Sanctions is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 11/20/2023. (GS) |
Filing 233 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court finds no error let alone clear errorin Magistrate Judge Scanlons decision. It entirely agrees that discovery has gone on far too long and has resulted in more than ample material to allow the parties to fully develop their theories of liability and defense. Accordingly, the plaintiffs 220 appeal and objections to the electronic order of January 20, 2023, are overruled. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 7/27/2023. (MI) |
Filing 215 ORDER denying 190 Motion to Compel; denying 199 Motion for Contempt. See attached document. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 12/9/2022. (GS) |
Filing 174 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 171 Motion for Protective Order and Sanctions. See attached document. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 5/27/2022. (Scully, Nicole) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.