Mason et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
| Lazaro Becerra, Ryan Carroll, Osagie Ehigie, Ashleigh Mason and Dan Morse |
| Lumber Liquidators, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv04780 |
| August 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Margo K. Brodie |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
278
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 274 Motion for Settlement; granting 277 Motion for Settlement; ORDER dismissing case. The Court concludes that the settlement is fair and reasonable and was reached as a result of arms-length negotiat ions between the parties. The Parties' agreed form of Settlement Notice (DE #276-1 at ECF pp. 24-28) is approved. This action is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to reinstate on or before180 days after the first Settlement Notices are s ent pursuant to the terms of the Settlement. In the event a motion to reinstate is not filed on or before 180 days after the first Settlement Notices are sent, the case shall be deemed, without further order of the Court, to be dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the case. See attached. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 4/27/2022. (Proujansky, Josh)
|
|
Filing
218
MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 213 Motion to Strike and 216 Motion to Seal Document and for Sanctions. The Court will disregard and deem stricken the following portions of the parties' recent filings: defendant&# 039;s portion of the parties' joint letter of November 10, 2020 (DE #212 at 3-4), beyond the first paragraph; paragraphs 2 through 5 and 10 of the Declaration of Karin M. Cogbill (DE #212-5); the Declaration of Dominic Messiha (DE #213-1), attac hed to plaintiffs' motion to strike; plaintiffs' November 10th "clarifying" letter (DE #214); defendant's November 15th response to that letter (DE #215); Section A and Exhibit A to defendant's November 17th letter (DE # 216 and #216-1); and plaintiffs' November 18th letter and attachment thereto (DE #217 and #217-1). The Court declines to impose sanctions and warns both sides that it will not tolerate their continued efforts to expand the record on a motion that has now been fully submitted. The Clerk is respectfully requested to seal the Messiha Declaration (DE #213-1). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 11/24/2020. (Proujansky, Josh)
|
|
Filing
209
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 205 Motion to Compel. See attached for discussion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 9/9/2020. (Proujansky, Josh)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in substantial part 80 Motion to Compel; denying 82 Motion to Stay. See attached for discussion. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Roanne L. Mann on 6/5/2019. (Proujansky, Josh)
|
|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 41 Motion to Certify FLSA Collective Action. In the attached appendix, the Court has revised the precise language of the forms, since plaintiffs' proposed Notices suffer from certain errors and omissions. See attached for discussion. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Roanne L. Mann on 5/13/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Notice to SMs, # 2 Appendix Notice to SMITs, # 3 Appendix Combined Notice, # 4 Appendix Consent Form) (Proujansky, Josh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
