Brown v. City of New York et al
| Plaintiff: |
Keith Brown |
| Defendant: |
City of New York and Police Department |
| Case Number: |
1:2017cv05835 |
| Filed: |
October 5, 2017 |
| Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Office: |
Brooklyn Office |
| Presiding Judge: |
Lois Bloom |
| Presiding Judge: |
LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Nature of Suit: |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed |
Document Text |
| May 17, 2018 |
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached order as well as the Court's April 10, 2018 order, the complaint is hereby dismissed. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would n ot be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. U.S., 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. So Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 5/17/2018. (Almonte, Giselle)
|
| April 10, 2018 |
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached order, Plaintiff's § 1983 complaint is dismissed against the City of New York and the New York City Police Department for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 2 8 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption to reflect their dismissal. In light of Plaintiff's pro se status, Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days to amend his complaint. Should Plaintiff decide to file an amended complaint, it must be submitted within thirty days of this Order, be captioned Amended Complaint, and bear the same docket number as this Order. In the amended complaint, Plaintiff should include allegations that would support an inferenc e that an official policy or custom of the City of New York caused a violation of his federally protected rights and/or name individual defendant(s), who have some personal involvement in the actions he alleges and provide the dates and locations for each relevant event. If Plaintiff does not know the names of the individuals, he may identify each of them as Jane Doe or John Doe. To the best of his ability, Plaintiff must describe each individual and the role she or he played in the alleged de privation of his rights. Plaintiff is advised that the amended complaint will completely replace the original complaint, so Plaintiff must include in the amended complaint any facts or claims that he wishes to pursue against proper defendants. To a id Plaintiff with this task, the Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to provide a "Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner)" form to Plaintiff. Further, if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or otherwise comply wit h this Order within the time allowed, the action shall be dismissed and judgment shall enter. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 4/10/2018. (Valentin, Winnethka)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?