PacNet Services Ltd. v. United States Department of the Treasury
PacNet Services Ltd |
John Doe 1-73 and United States Department of the Treasury |
1:2017cv06027 |
October 16, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Lois Bloom |
Nicholas G. Garaufis |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 175 ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Order, the Court denies the motions filed by PacNet and I-Payout, (ECF Nos. 139 , 158 , 161 ), grants OFAC's motions to dismiss, (ECF Nos. 137 , 139 ), and dismisses the interpleader action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court previously noted the default of the John Doe Defendants that did not appear in the interpleader action. Given the Court's dismissal of the interpleader action, the Answers of all parties that have a ppeared are dismissed. Any party that appeared in the interpleader action and filed an Answer (or received an extension of time from Judge Garaufis for such a filing) is hereby granted leave to file a claim, if appropriate, in Young, 18-cr-46, within 30 days from the date of this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to close 17-cv-6027. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 2/24/2021. (Ortiz, Grisel) Modified docket text on 2/24/2021 (Ortiz, Grisel). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.