Perry v. Furman's Lab LLC et al
Roberts Perry |
Enmanuel De Jesus and Furman's Lab LLC |
1:2017cv06107 |
October 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Roanne L. Mann |
Eric N. Vitaliano |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, For the foregoing reasons. Judge Mann's R&R is adopted, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court, with judgment to be entered in favor of Perry, against Furman's Lab LLC andEnmanuel De Jesus, jointly and severally, in the amount of $31,031.78. This sum represents $3,780 in unpaid minimum wages, $6,142.50 for unpaid overtime, $619.50 in spread-of-hours pay, $2,950 in statutory damages for notice violations, $9 ,922.50 in liquidated damages, $700 in unpaid tips, $6,321.42 in attorney's fees, and $595.86 in costs. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose ofan appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 920-21, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, to mail a copy of this order to the pro se defendant, and to close this case for administrative purposes. (Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 10/28/18) c/m Fwd. for Judgment. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.