El-Bey v. District of Columbia et al
| Stanley Aristilde El-Bey |
| County of Queens, District of Columbia, New York City Police Department and State of New York |
| 1:2017cv06203 |
| October 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Margo K. Brodie |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court grants Plaintiff's 4 request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 solely for the purpose of this Memorandum and Order. Accordingly, the Court dismisses the Complaint for failure to state a claim. The Court grants Plaintiff thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to file an amended complaint. To aid Plaintiff with this task, the Court respectfully requests the Clerk of Court to provide Plainti ff with a "Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights" form and an in forma pauperis form. If Plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint, the Court will enter judgment dismissing this action for the reasons set forth above. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Memorandum and Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Margo K. Brodie, on 11/1/2018. C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
