Bey et al v. Gursky et al
| Kathleen Caron Claxton Bey and Kevin Andre Gilgeours El |
| John Arthur Casey, Daisy Elfreda Crawford-Mereigh, Catherine Ann Gursky, Jane Henry, Aileen Langston, Shaji Nirmala, Alexander Gerald Rodriguez, Elizabeth Smith and Dhanelle Tassy |
| 1:2017cv06447 |
| November 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: No objections have been filed to Magistrate Judge Bloom's sua sponte Report and Recommendation 34 to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(f) and 37(b)(2)( A) for Plaintiffs' failure to appear at the Court's March 15, 2018 conference and repeated failures to comply with the Court's orders. The Court has reviewed the record and the Report and Recommendation for clear error, and, finding no ne, hereby adopts Judge Bloom's Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the opinion of this Court. Defendants' motion to dismiss 27 , 28 is TERMINATED as MOOT. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close the case. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 4/3/2018. (Jones, D'Juan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
