DeSuze et al v. Carson et al
| Mary DeSuze, Angela Jones, Elvia Scharschmidt, Petra Montgomery, Leonard Andre, Arlene Hipp, Carlota Brown, Renee Avent, Deborah Priester, Louise Grant and Pamela Lockley |
| The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Ben Carson, Linden Plaza Preservation L.P. and Linden Plaza Associates, L.P. |
| 1:2018cv00180 |
| January 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Nicholas G Garaufis |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ben Carson, Linden Plaza Associates, L.P., Linden Plaza Preservation L.P., New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, filed by Renee Avent, Pamela Lockley, Louise Grant, Carlota Brown, Leonard Andre, Angela Jones, Deborah Priester, Mary DeSuze, Elvia Scharschmidt, Arlene Hipp, Petra Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
| FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number 4653123341 (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
