Giordano v. Alfonso et al
| Lisa Giordano |
| Oscar Alfonso and Oscar Trucking Inc. |
| 1:2018cv00822 |
| February 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Cheryl L Pollak |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Lisa Giordano. (Renna, Robert) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Oscar Alfonso, Oscar Trucking Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Oscar Alfonso, Oscar Trucking Inc. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Lisa Giordano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number 4653124379 (Bowens, Priscilla) |
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: In order for a federal court to exercise subject-matter jurisdiction, a plaintiff must either (1) put forth a claim arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States, creating federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331; or (2) show that the action is between citizens of different states for an amount exceeding $75,000, creating diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). It is well established that [i]f the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action. Nash v. Ptashnink, No. 10-cv-5556, 2010 WL 5476697, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 30, 2010) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3)). In this case, the plaintiff claims that the Court has diversity jurisdiction, yet she alleges that the plaintiff and both defendants reside in the State of New York. By February 14, 2018, the plaintiff is ordered to show cause why I should not dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Ordered by Judge Ann M Donnelly on 2/7/2018. (Winik, Sara)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
