Sultan v. Coinbase, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ezra C. Sultan
Defendant: Coinbase, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv00934
Filed: February 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Frederic Block
Referring Judge: Steven Tiscione
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2019 Filing 26 Letter to Judge Block re status by Ezra C. Sultan (Dweck, Jack)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order ELECTRONIC ORDER DISMISSING CASE: See entry #25 . Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 12/4/2019. (Innelli, Michael)
December 3, 2019 Filing 25 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Coinbase, Inc. (Kim, Paul)
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order STATUS REPORT ORDER: By December 6, 2019 counsel shall file a letter as to the status of their arbitration. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 11/26/2019. (Innelli, Michael)
September 19, 2019 Filing 24 Letter to Hon. Frederic Block - Arbitration Status Update by Coinbase, Inc. (Kim, Paul)
August 29, 2019 Filing 23 Letter to Judge Block regarding Status Report Order by Ezra C. Sultan (Dweck, Jack)
August 26, 2019 Filing 22 Letter to Hon. Frederic Block - Arbitration Status Update by Coinbase, Inc. (Kim, Paul)
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order STATUS REPORT ORDER: By September 6, 2019 counsel shall file a letter as to the status of their arbitration. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 8/22/2019. (Innelli, Michael)
July 10, 2019 Filing 21 Letter to Hon. Frederic Block - Arbitration Status Update by Coinbase, Inc. (Kim, Paul)
June 4, 2019 Filing 20 Letter to Hon. Frederic Block - Arbitration Status Update by Coinbase, Inc. (Kim, Paul)
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order ELECTRONIC STATUS REPORT ORDER: By June 6, 2019 counsel shall file a letter as to the status of their arbitration. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 5/30/2019. (Innelli, Michael)
January 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM and ORDER: There is no dispute that Sultan had inquiry notice of the User Agreement, including its mandatory arbitration provision, and that he manifested his assent to that agreement. There being no dispute that this lawsuit is within the scope of the arbitration provision, Coinbases motion #16 to compel arbitration is granted. Since Coinbase has requested that the lawsuit be stayed pending arbitration, such a stay is granted. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 1/24/2019. (Innelli, Michael)
January 16, 2019 Filing 18 Letter to Hon. Frederic Block Providing Notice of Supplemental Authority by Coinbase, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Starke v. SquareTrade, Inc., No. 17-2474 (2d Cir. January 10, 2019)) (Kim, Paul)
July 5, 2018 Filing 17 Letter to Hon. Frederic Block Enclosing Courtesy Copies by Coinbase, Inc. (Kim, Paul)
July 5, 2018 Filing 16 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Coinbase, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration - Justin Lyn in Support, #3 Exhibit 1 - User Agreement, #4 Exhibit 2- Account Creation Webpage, #5 Exhibit 3 - Account Creation Webpage with Prompt, #6 Exhibit 4 - Event Report, #7 Proposed Order, #8 Certificate of Service, #9 Memorandum in Opposition, #10 Declaration Ezra Sultan in Opposition, #11 Exhibit 1 - Email Message, #12 Certificate of Service, #13 Memorandum in Support - Reply, #14 Declaration - Justin Lyn in Reply) (Kim, Paul)
June 13, 2018 Filing 15 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Ezra C. Sultan. (Lum, Robert)
June 13, 2018 Opinion or Order ELECTRONIC ORDER: Granting the parties stipulation #15 extending the time until July 5, 2018 for the parties to serve and file their fully briefed motion to compel arbitration. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 6/13/2018. (Innelli, Michael)
May 9, 2018 Filing 14 Letter to Judge Block with proposed briefing schedule by Coinbase, Inc. (Kim, Paul)
May 9, 2018 Filing 13 Letter to MJ Tiscione re: Confidentiality Order by Coinbase, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kim, Paul)
May 9, 2018 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: By June 27, 2018 counsel shall file their fully briefed motion to compel arbitration according to J. Blocks motion rules. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 5/9/2018. (Innelli, Michael)
May 9, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER re #13 Letter filed by Coinbase, Inc.: The confidentiality Order is approved and hereby entered as an Order of the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 5/9/2018. (Vasquez, Lea)
May 2, 2018 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Frederic Block: Jack Dweck, Esq. for the plaintiff and Paul Han Kim, Esq. for the defendants, all present. Pre-motion conference held on 5/2/2018. Defendants anticipated motion to compel arbitration was discussed. By May 9, 2018 counsel shall ECF file a letter with their agreed upon briefing schedule. Counsel shall serve and ECF file their fully briefed motion according to J. Blocks motion rules.(Court Reporter: Not Reported) (Innelli, Michael)
April 10, 2018 Opinion or Order ELECTRONIC ORDER: Defendant's letter application #12 dated 4/9/18, with the consent of plaintiff's counsel is GRANTED. The pre-motion conference scheduled for April 19, 2018 is adjourned to May 2, 2018 at 11:00 A.M. The Court is not available on the other dates requested by counsel. There will be no formal notice mailed to counsel. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other the date and time of this conference. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 4/10/2018. (Innelli, Michael)
April 9, 2018 Filing 12 Letter MOTION to Adjourn Conference by Coinbase, Inc.. (Kim, Paul)
April 9, 2018 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Coinbase, Inc. (Kim, Paul)
April 9, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Myung Han Kim on behalf of Coinbase, Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Kim, Paul)
April 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: The defendant's letter application #7 dated 3/23/18 is GRANTED. A pre motion conference is scheduled on April 19, 2018 @ 11AM. There will be no formal notice mailed to counsel. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other the date and time of this conference. If this date presents a conflict counsel shall first obtain the consent from all the parties to adjourn this conference and then file a letter application. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 4/9/2018. (Innelli, Michael)
March 30, 2018 Filing 8 Letter to Court regarding Def.'s Request for Pre-Motion Conf. by Ezra C. Sultan (Dweck, Jack)
March 23, 2018 Filing 7 Letter Request for Pre-Motion Conference by Coinbase, Inc. (Kim, Paul)
March 5, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to March 23, 2018 to Answer for Defendant. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 3/5/2018. (Vasquez, Lea)
March 2, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Request to So-Order Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint) by Coinbase, Inc.. (Kim, Paul)
February 14, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ezra C. Sultan. Coinbase, Inc. served on 2/14/2018, answer due 3/7/2018. (Dweck, Jack)
February 14, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Coinbase, Inc.. (Davis, Kimberly)
February 14, 2018 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
February 14, 2018 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
February 14, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
February 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Coinbase, Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10196579 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Ezra C. Sultan. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dweck, Jack)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sultan v. Coinbase, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coinbase, Inc.
Represented By: Paul Myung Han Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ezra C. Sultan
Represented By: Jack S. Dweck
Represented By: Robert J. Lum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?