Ko v. Sessions
Plaintiff: Seumg Ook Ko
Defendant: Jeff Sessions
Case Number: 1:2018cv01024
Filed: February 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Jack B Weinstein
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jeff Sessions Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Seumg Ook Ko. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla)
February 15, 2018 FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number 4653124742 (Bowens, Priscilla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ko v. Sessions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Seumg Ook Ko
Represented By: Yunsung Choi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff Sessions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?