Hossain v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
| Mohammed T. Hossain |
| Financial Recovery Services, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv01069 |
| February 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Sterling Johnson |
| James Orenstein |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. ( Ordered by Judge Sterling Johnson, Jr on 9/6/2018 ) (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
ORDER re: #9 Stipulation of Dismissal -- In light of the parties' stipulation of dismissal, all conferences scheduled before me are cancelled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 6/20/2018. (Salvador, Anjali)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Mohammed T. Hossain (Tariq, Subhan) |
| Filing 8 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference with respect to FRS' desired motion for summary judgment by Financial Recovery Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Rule 56.1 Statement, #2 Declaration of CACH, LLC, #3 Declaration of Brian Bowers with Exhibit A) (Etmund, Michael) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Deadline for all Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures: March 30, 2018. First request for production of documents and first request for interrogatories due by: April 30, 2018. Deadline for joinder of additional parties and amendment of pleadings: May 30, 2018. All discovery, including all expert disclosures under Rule 26(a)(2), if any, to be completed by: June 29, 2018. Pretrial Conference (ex parte statements of settlement position due via email two business days in advance): July 13, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. Dispositive motion process started by: July 27, 2018. Joint pretrial order due by: August 24, 2018. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 2/28/2018. (Guy, Alicia)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER -- I will not require an initial discovery planning conference in this case, and the parties are not required to meet and confer in accordance with Rule 26(f). Instead, I will enter a separate case management and scheduling order that contemplates the completion of all discovery within four months. If there is an objection to the court's schedule, any party may either: (1) upon a showing of good cause and with the other party's consent, submit a proposed discovery plan in the form of the attached questionnaire; or (2) submit a letter request for an in-court conference that also sets forth the grounds for a different schedule. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James Orenstein on 2/28/2018. (Attachments: #1 Questionnaire) (Guy, Alicia)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Financial Recovery Services, Inc.. (Etmund, Michael) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Financial Recovery Services, Inc. (Etmund, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Financial Recovery Services, Inc. from Civil Court of City of New York County of Queens, case number 001604. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0207-10211501) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court Summons & Complaint, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Etmund, Michael) |
| Case assigned to Judge Sterling Johnson, Jr and Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hossain v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Financial Recovery Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Thomas Etmund |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mohammed T. Hossain | |
| Represented By: | Subhan Tariq |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
